Showing posts with label police state. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police state. Show all posts

Friday, August 12, 2011

Albert Camus speaks out about the war on drugs in Mexico

Well, not quite; it's actually the Mexican poet Javier Sicilia. But that's just an unimportant detail.
The politicians are formulating the drug problem as an issue of national security, but it is an issue of public health. If from the very beginning drugs were decriminalized, drug lords would be subjected to the iron laws of the market. That would have controlled them. That would have allowed us to discover our drug addicts and offer them our love and our support. That would not have left us with 40,000 dead, 10,000 disappeared and 120,000 displaced…
The war is caused by puritan mentalities: like those of [Mexican President Felipe] Calderón and [former U.S. President George] Bush. In the name of abstractions—the abstraction of saving youth from drug addiction—they have brutally assassinated thousands of young people, while transforming others into delinquents.
Albert Camus spoke a terrible truth. “I know something worse than hate: abstract love.” In the name of abstract love, in the name of God and Country, in the name of saving the youth from the drug, in the name of the proletariat, in the name of abstractions, our politicians and war policy makers have committed the most atrocious crimes on human beings, who are not abstractions, who are bones and flesh. That is what our country is living and suffering today: in the name of an abstract goodness, we are suffering the opposite: the horror of war and violence, of innocents dead, disappeared, and mutilated.
Source.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

1954

Leopold Tyrmand's Dziennik 1954 (or "Diary 1954") is hands down one of the best books I've ever read. It really is a shame it's never been translated into English. It's an incredibly insightful account of daily life in a totalitarian state, less dramatic than The Gulag Archipelago, but in its own way terrifying. It chronicles the first three months of 1954 in the life of an aspiring writer who lives in Warsaw.

The book offers an immensely interesting look into the daily routine of someone who is trying to survive in stalinist Poland while being in profound moral opposition to the cruel regime but completely unable to outwardly express that opposition for fear of career- or even life-ending retribution from the authorities. But on top of vivid description, Tyrmand's book offers some truly great analysis. It's full of incredibly insightful observations about how the system works. For example, it explains why communist propaganda was so crude and obnoxious, even though it was relatively easy for the authorities to make it just a little bit more friendly and attractive to the consumers without risking much. The crudeness wasn't due to incompetence; it was purposeful, because the goal of propaganda was not to persuade people but to demoralize and intimidate them.

But the most powerful insight of the book (or, at any rate, the most powerful one to me) was an observation that living in a totalitarian state robs everyone of their identity by making it impossible for anyone to define themselves by themselves. Everyone, whether collaborating with the regime or opposed to it, is forced to define their very own self relative to the system they live in. You can't live in communism and simply ignore it. There is so much injustice, cruelty and lies at every corner of your life that it is impossible for you to not think about it; almost every thought you have is a thus a reaction to something you've seen, heard about or read that you viscerally disagree with. Whether you like it or not, your entire inner life becomes a constant polemic with the communist monstrosity surrounding you; there are almost no thoughts left that are entirely your own. Communism robs you of your thoughts. That realization was extremely painful to Tyrmand; he repeatedly complains that even his diary, which is supposed to be the most intimate, personal form of writing, talks about the horrible reality of stalinism more than anything else. There is a great scene in the book that shows exactly how stalinism devours everyone's soul, even those who hate it. Tyrmand is riding a bus with his girlfriend Bogna (not her real name), a high school senior (I think she's 18 at the time but don't remember for sure). Bogna is talking high school gossip, being all loud and cheerful and youthful. As their bus drives by the infamous Rakowiecka Prison, a place where thousands of innocent people were being held, tortured and executed without charges, Bogna bursts into a particularly loud fit of laughter because of something she's talking about that she thinks is funny. Tyrmand gets infuriated by her lack of sensitivity, yells at her for laughing out loud and reminds her that behind the walls they've just passed innocent people are being tortured as they speak. Bogna looks at him incomprehensibly and then blurts out: 'You know what? You're nuts. You're just as insane as they are. All you ever talk about is what the communists are doing.'

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Land of the free

Last week, after being held for a month without charges in jail in a military base in Kuwait, Bradley Manning, the man who leaked video of an American helicopter gunning down innocent people in Afganistan, has been charged by the government with crimes that carry maximum sentences adding up to 52 years in prison.

You might say, well, that's rule of law. Manning did steal classified data. I hope you'll scream rule of law with equal passion the next time a law enforcement agent gets away scott-free with abusing an innocent person.

Monday, July 5, 2010

Here's hoping you get arrested

How many times have you heard the line "Only those who have done something wrong have a reason to fear law enforcement?" It's an incredibly irresponsible and dangerous belief. It is dangerous because if it becomes sanctioned as a social norm and/or law, it pretty much gives law enforcement agencies license to get away with murder. After all, if we believe that only those who have done something wrong have any reason to be nervous about law enforcement taking an interest in them, then we also believe that everyone that law enforcement is taking an interest in has done something wrong.

I'm sure everyone has heard of cops doing (and getting away with) things that the rest of us would rightfully be severely punished for. Things like beating up on a person for no reason. Or brutalizing a pregnant woman with a taser. Or shooting two pets of a seven year old child right in front of her. Or shooting a handcuffed man lying on the ground straight in his back and killing him. (Warning: If you're enjoying your day and want it to stay this way, don't watch the video embedded in that last link. Watching it will make you cry with anger. It will make you want to smash things and punch walls. It will make you wish that this cop, and everyone who is trying to excuse his behavior, meets the same agonizing end that his victim did.) Things of this sort happen often, and very few people care. Those acts are a consequence of believing that everyone who the law enforcement is dealing with is by definition a wrongdoer. If you create an environment where cops can get away with beating up on or even killing innocent people, then being a police officer becomes an attractive job for individuals who enjoy beating up on and killing people. Of course, there's violence in our society in general so acts like these will unfortunately happen no matter what. However, when it's police officers doing those things, it is our fault as a society. It happens because, when they use force excessively, we are too lenient, too quick to excuse and rationalize their brutality. This leniency has led to a situation where basically everyone is guilty by default. The cops can arrest whoever they like. There are "catch-all" charges that will basically always stick in court, at least so long as there are no non-police witnesses of the arrest. (Here in New York City, such charge is "disorderly conduct." In Baltimore, Maryland, it is "loitering." Etc.) And the occurrence of situations when non-police witnesses are present is also actively minimized. The state of Illinois has recently made it illegal to photograph or video-record police officers on duty; I'm sure that even in those states where such thing is legal, the police have plenty of informal measures to discourage it.

To everyone who has ever said that only those who have done wrong have anything to fear from law enforcement: whenever police officers mishandle, assault or kill an innocent person, it is your fault. I hope someday you'll get arrested. Maybe that will teach you something.