A Stunning Non Sequitur

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Stunning links

What happens when human crowd goes on a stampede.

What exactly does "brilliant legal mind" mean?

A sane court ruling on drug use.

Let's tax the sh*t out of technological progress; after all, it puts people out of work.

Economist talks about the Polish government's long-term financial strategy (in Polish).
Posted by przemek at 3:19 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: stunning links

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

About Me

My photo
przemek
Born and raised in Poland, lives and works in the U.S.
View my complete profile
This blog is strictly my private writing. Opinions expressed by the author of this blog represent no one other than the author of this blog.

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Favorite Blogs

  • Overcoming Bias
    Ngram Diversity Trends 1960+
    8 hours ago
  • Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
    Using hierarchical modeling to get more stable rankings of gene expression
    9 hours ago
  • R-bloggers
    How to Write Cucumber Specifications the Right Way: From App Description to Scenarios
    23 hours ago
  • The Endeavour
    Counting sums of squares
    1 day ago
  • Steven Landsburg
    Help With A Subtitle
    2 months ago
  • God plays dice
    YOU get a leap year! And YOU get a leap year!
    4 months ago
  • Eric Falkenstein
    A Better Stablecoin on a Perp DEX
    1 year ago
  • Krzysztof Leski
    Żywieni, bronieni
    4 years ago
  • Jarosław Flis
    Świąteczna zmiana miejsc?
    6 years ago
  • The Last Psychiatrist
    Who Bullies The Bullies?
    11 years ago
  • Funding Your Analyst
    What Is Life About?
    12 years ago

Archive

  • ►  2016 (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2015 (10)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
  • ►  2013 (5)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (71)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2011 (75)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2010 (237)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (28)
    • ▼  August (43)
      • Say what?
      • Rationalizing cruelty, again
      • A graph is worth a thousand words: World War II an...
      • Stunning links
      • Is suicide bad?
      • Beautiful experiments in social science: Reversing...
      • The opposite of truth is just as good as truth
      • That's right!
      • Retroregulation
      • Yoga people
      • Sound policy advice from The Onion
      • Buying votes can be a good thing
      • Sometimes you see a line so stupid...
      • One more about Newt
      • But what does the law actually say?
      • Stunning links
      • When the mean is meaningless
      • Where's the risk premium?
      • Odds that you'll die from...
      • Proofs aren't meant to convince anyone
      • Better strongly wrong than weakly right
      • No virtue without sacrifice
      • Never forget you're talking to a bunch of six-year...
      • I deny her refutation
      • Stunning links
      • Subway ad
      • In defense of vandalism
      • Scientific betting markets
      • Engagement rings follow-up
      • Engagement rings have outlived their purpose. And ...
      • From the "I wish I'd said this" file
      • Does P != NP and why do some people not understand...
      • If you were a bank, would you do that?
      • Stunning links
      • An imperfect argument
      • A perfect world
      • Live long only if your brain is young
      • Why would anyone want to be the Prime Minister of ...
      • 10^(10^100) nerdy math hints
      • Stunning links
      • Insufficient success measure
      • Admit it: you're just jealous
      • A quote
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (19)
    • ►  May (15)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2009 (49)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (2)

Labels

  • anything (161)
  • politics (110)
  • economics (94)
  • Poland (53)
  • philosophy (31)
  • ethics (25)
  • math (24)
  • fallacies (23)
  • evolution (22)
  • soccer (19)
  • signalling (16)
  • game theory (14)
  • R (13)
  • cognitive bias (12)
  • non sequitur of the month (12)
  • logic (11)
  • stunning links (10)
  • history (7)
  • TSA (6)
  • covers (5)
  • police state (5)
  • science (5)
  • drug war (4)
  • Christianity (2)
  • The Wire (1)
  • beautiful experiments (1)
Miscellaneous Links

Social Science Resources

  • Brian Skyrms
  • Evolution: This View of Life
  • Evolutionary Psychology Journal
  • Game Theory.net
  • Game-Theoretic Models of Personality
  • Jaakko Hintikka
  • Ken Binmore
  • Robin Hanson
  • Rohit Parikh
  • Significance Magazine
  • VirtualLabs in Evolutionary Game Theory

Free Software

  • CodeCogs Online LaTeX Editor
  • Eclipse
  • FeedDemon
  • GIMP
  • Gnumeric
  • Inkscape
  • MiKTeX
  • NetLogo
  • Notepad++
  • Python(x,y)
  • R
  • RStudio

Other Stuff

  • Arsenal FC
  • Intrade
  • Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
  • lifehacker
  • Polandian
  • Police Misconduct Reporting Project
  • The Hitler Zombie
  • xkcd
Ethereal theme. Theme images by gaffera. Powered by Blogger.